B.  Criteria


C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)
There are three termination criteria:  abandonment, parental unfitness, and failure to progress.

1.  Abandonment

The court may terminate the parent-child legal relationship if the parents abandon the child. The parents must have surrendered custody for at least six months. They must not have manifested a firm intent to the child, court, or caregiver to resume or obtain custody or make permanent legal arrangements for the child’s care.


C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(a)(II)
Abandonment can also be found if the parent is unknown. The identity of the parent must be unknown for at least three months. The court must also find reasonable efforts were made to locate the parent. 

C.R.S. § 19-3-603
An affidavit must be filed at least ten days before the hearing, stating what efforts were made to locate the parent who is subject to the motion.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(a)
The child must have been found to be neglected or dependent. A dependency and neglect (D&N) adjudication is a prerequisite for termination under both types of abandonment.

People in the Interest of D.C.-M.S., 111 P.3d 559 (Colo. App. 2005)
A trial court may terminate parental rights on the basis of one or more statutory grounds established by clear and convincing evidence.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)
2.  Parental Unfitness

The court may terminate the parent-child legal relationship if the parent is unfit. The child must have been adjudicated neglected or dependent. The court must find that no treatment plan could address the parent’s unfitness. Unfitness may be based on:

  • Mental illness;
  • Child’s injury;
  • Incarceration;
  • Sibling’s injury;
  • Habitual abuse;
  • Sexual abuse;
  • Torture.
C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(I)
People in the Interest of N.F., 820 P.2d 1128 (Colo. App. 1991).

Mental illness:  emotional or mental illness or mental deficiency renders the parent unable to meet the child’s ongoing needs within a reasonable time. For example, a sexually abusive father, diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder, not amenable to treatment, had his rights terminated under this definition.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(II) and (2)(d)
Child’s injury: when the child suffered serious bodily injury or a disfiguring injury.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(III)
People in the Interest of T.T., 845 P.2d 539 (Colo. App. 1992)

Incarceration: when an incarcerated parent is ineligible for parole for at least six years from the date of the D&N adjudication. For a child under age six, the incarcerated parent is ineligible for parole for at least three years. The court does not have to wait for the parent’s criminal appeals to be resolved to terminate under this definition.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(IV) and (2)(g)
Sibling’s injury: when the child’s sibling suffered serious bodily injury or death due to proven parental abuse or neglect.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(V)
C.R.S. § 19-3-102(2)

Habitual abuse: when another child has been subjected to an identifiable pattern of habitual abuse. The adjudication of dependence or neglect was based on sexual or physical abuse, or the parent was convicted of that child’s death. This definition is the same as a D&N adjudication based on “abused child’s sibling.”

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(VI)
Sexual abuse: where the child has been subjected to an identifiable pattern of sexual abuse.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(VII)
Torture: where either parent has tortured a child or subjected a child to extreme cruelty.

People in the Interest of M.H., 683 P.2d 807 (Colo. App. 1984)
Termination of the parent-child relationship is not designed to punish the parent, but to give the child an opportunity for a new permanent caregiver. As a result, some parents will lose their rights through no fault of their own.

The court in M.H. said it best: “This case presents yet another situation wherein a natural mother loves her child, but is unable, through no specific fault of her own, to provide the child with the necessary parental care to enable that child to thrive, grow, and reach maturity. It was to ensure these benefits for a child under these circumstances that the statute was enacted.”


C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(c)
3.  Failure to Progress

The court may terminate if the parent fails to progress under the treatment plan.  Failure to progress may be based on these four elements:

  • The child has been adjudicated neglected or dependent; and
  • The court-ordered treatment plan has failed; and
  • The parent is unfit; and
  • The parent’s conduct or condition is unlikely to change within a reasonable time.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(I)
The court-ordered treatment plan has failed: Either the parent has failed to reasonably comply with the plan, or the plan has not been successful. It has failed if the parent has missed visitation without good cause. It has also failed if the parent’s problems have not adequately improved, including the parent’s relationship with the child. You must find the plan has failed if the parent, despite intervention and treatment, is unable or unwilling to provide “reasonable parental care.”

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)
“Reasonable parental care” includes, at minimum, nurturing and safe parenting sufficiently adequate to meet the child’s physical, emotional and mental needs and conditions.

People in the Interest of L.G., 737 P.2d 431 (Colo. App. 1987)
The treatment plan must be appropriate. The appropriateness of the treatment plan is determined by the likelihood of its success in achieving family reunification.  

People in the Interest of C.A.K., 652 P.2d 603 (Colo. 1982)
The plan itself does not have to contain explicit measures of success. 
People in the Interest of B.J.D., 626 P.2d 727 (Colo. App. 1981)
It must consider, however, the parent’s specific circumstances.
C.R.S. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(II)
The parent is unfit: The court must find that continuing the parent-child relationship is likely to result in grave risk of death of serious injury to the child or that the parent’s conduct or condition renders the parent unable or unwilling to give the child reasonable parental care. 

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)
This care is to include, at a minimum, nurturing and safe parenting sufficiently adequate to meet the child’s physical, emotional and mental health needs and conditions. In addition, the parent’s conduct or condition must be unlikely to change within a reasonable time. 

People in the Interest of T.S.B., 757 P.2d 1112 (Colo. App. 1988)
Reasonable time is based on the child’s needs.

The court may determine “unfitness” based on the definitions for “parental unfitness” termination criteria, based on any one of the following:

  • Abusive conduct;
  • Violent history;
  • Serious bodily injury to the child;
  • Single incident that threatens life of the child;
  • Substance abuse;
  • Child neglect;
  • Sibling’s injury or death;
  • Felony assault;
  • Prior involvement with DHS;
  • Reasonable efforts failed;
  • Fifteen months in care;
  • Two prior adjudications;
  • Prior termination of parental rights;
  • Other factors.
C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(b)
C.R.S. § 19-5-105(3.1)(a)(III)

Abusive conduct: the parent’s conduct toward the child has been of a physical or sexually abusive nature.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(c)
C.R.S. § 19-5-105(3.1)(a)(IV)

Violent history: the parent has a history of violent behavior, such as domestic abuse.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(d)
Serious injury to child or an incident that threatens the life of child: the injury caused serious bodily injury or disfigurement.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(e)
C.R.S. § 19-5-105(3.1)(a)(V)
C.R.S. § 12-22-303(7)

Substance abuse: the parent’s excessive use of intoxicating liquors or controlled substances has affected the parent’s ability to care and provide for the child.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(f)
C.R.S. § 19-5-105(3.1)(a)(VI)
C.R.S. § 19-3-102(1)(d)

Child neglect: the parent has neglected the child. Neglect is the failure or refusal to provide the child with proper or necessary subsistence, education, medical care, or any other care necessary for the child’s health, guidance or well-being.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(g)
Sibling’s injury or death: the parent has committed, aided or abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited the murder or voluntary manslaughter of the child’s sibling.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(j)
Felony assault: the parent has committed a felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or to another child of the parent.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(i)
Prior involvement: the parent has had prior involvement with county DHS concerning an abuse or neglect incident and a subsequent incident of abuse or neglect has occurred.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(h)
Reasonable efforts failed: child-caring agencies have made reasonable efforts that have been unable to rehabilitate the parent.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(k)
Fifteen months in care: the child has been in DHS care for fifteen of the last twenty-two months unless:
  • The child is in relative care;
  • DHS has documented in a case plan available for court review that termination is not in the child’s best interests;
  • Services necessary to the child’s safe return have not been provided to the family, consistent with the time period in the case plan (unless the court waived reasonable efforts);
  • The child’s stay in care has been extended due to circumstances beyond the parent’s control such as incarceration, court delays, or continuances not requested by the parent.
C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(l)
Two prior adjudications: on at least two prior occasions, a child in the custody of the parent has been adjudicated dependent or neglected.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)(m)
One prior termination: on at least one occasion a parent has had their parent-child legal relationship terminated.

C.R.S. § 19-3-604(2)
Other factors: the list above is not exclusive. The court may also consider other factors that point to the parent’s unfitness.

In the Interest of M.M., ___ P.3d ___ (Colo. App., April 16, 2009)
At the termination hearing, evidence of polygraph examinations are inadmissible, and a trial court should not consider the opinions of an expert who bases an opinion on polygraph evidence.

People in the Interest of M.W., 796 P.2d 66 (Colo. App. 1990)
Even parents who comply with the treatment plan may have their parental rights terminated if they do not make progress. For example, in M.W., the mother suffered from long-term mental illness, but had stabilized on medication, and was able to live and work on her own. She also had maintained regular contact with her daughter. Despite her commendable progress, however, she could not meet her daughter’s needs, and her rights were terminated.