| A. Emergency Custody |
| C.R.S. § 19-3-401(1) |
A law
enforcement
officer may remove a child without a court order if the child is in
immediate
danger, such as if the child is:
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-401(3)(b) |
A
law
enforcement officer, upon the recommendation of DHS, a physician, a
nurse, or a
physician’s assistant, may detain a newborn child in hospital while an
order of
the court is being obtained.
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-401(3)(c) |
Court
orders
for custody of a newborn child are not required if:
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-402(2) |
The
law
enforcement officer must release the child to the parent or other
responsible
adult unless placement out of the home is necessary to the child’s best
interests and welfare. The
judge may
condition the child’s release or require a written promise to bring the
child
to court.
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-405 |
DHS
may
remove a child only with a court order. The court may issue an ex
parte
protective custody order, if continuing the child in the home or in the
responsible person’s custody presents a danger to the child’s life or
health in
the foreseeable future.
DHS, law enforcement, hospital administrators and physicians who has a child suspected of being neglected or abused may also request such an order. The order may be written or verbal and it expires in three court days. DHS must be notified to begin dependency and neglect (D&N) proceedings. |
| C.R.S. § 19-3-405(2)(b) and (4) |
The
court may
issue orders to protect the child without removal. An emergency protective order may restrain a
person from threatening, molesting, injuring or contacting the child or
from
interfering with the child’s supervision. The order expires in 72 hours, excluding Saturdays,
Sunday, and legal
holidays.
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-404 |
The
court may
order emergency caretaker services into the home. This option avoids a
foster
care placement. The
emergency caretaker
remains until a parent, guardian or legal custodian enters the home and
expresses a willingness and apparent ability to resume charge of the
child. The order
expires in 72 hours,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. (Emergency caregiver services are not
available in every county.)
|
| C.R.S. § 19-3-403(8) |
Any
law
enforcement officer, DHS employee or other person authorized by the
court or
statute to take or retain custody of a child has good faith immunity
from civil
or criminal liability. Immunity
also
extends to transporting the child and releasing the child from custody. Good faith is presumed.
|
| Malik
v. Arapahoe |
Malik
v. Arapahoe County DHS
held that qualified immunity did not
protect a police officer who requested an ex
parte protective custody order knowing the child was not in
danger. The police
officer had contacted the mother
about pornographic pictures of her daughter. The mother explained that they had been taken six
months prior by her
brother, who lived in another state. When the officer asked for an interview with her
daughter, the mother
hired an attorney to negotiate the terms of the interview.
After delays by the attorney, the officer obtained an ex parte removal order without telling the court about the mother’s attorney, or that the alleged perpetrator did not live with the child. After he interviewed the girl, he immediately released her to her mother. The federal district court found that these allegations, if proven in court, would establish a violation of the mother’s First Amendment rights to familial association and privacy and her Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable seizures. |